Revista Horizontes: primavera/otoño 2013 | Año LVI-LIX Núms. 108-115

Referencias Acosta Ramos, J.A. (2000). Modelos enfoques y estrategias de supervisión . San Juan: Publicaciones Yuquiyú Berson, E.J. (2012) Teacher's perspectives of teacher supervision policies & practices in Charter schools in Pennsylvania . (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Thesis database. (UMI No. 3493892) Chiavenato, I. (2007), Introducción a la Teoría general de la Administración. México: McGraw Hill. Claudio Tirado, R. (2003). 100 Años de Educación y Administración Educativa en Puerto Rico. Publicaciones Puertorriqueñas Inc. Hato Rey, Puerto Rico. Cohan & Goldhammer (1969) Clinical Supervision. Houghton- Mifflin Boston Danielson, C. (2011). The Framework for Teaching Evaluation Instrument . Princeton, NJ: The Danielson Group. Doerr, S.E. (2012). Charlotte Danielson's Theory of Teacher Evaluations: A Quantitative Study of Teachers' Perceptions on the Four Domains . (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from Pro Quest Dissertations and Theses database . (UMI No. 349968). Ginkel. (1983) Overview of study that investigated the relationship of teachers conceptual levels and preferences for supervisory approach. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research association Montreal, April. Glickman, C. (1985). Supervision of Instruction: A Developmental Perspective. Ally and Bacon: Boston. Humphrey, G. (1983) The relationship between orientations to supervision and the developmental levels of commitment and abstract thinking of entry-year teachers . Doctoral dissertation. University of Tulsa. Disertation Abstract International 44:1644A Marzano, Toth (2013). Teachers Evaluation That Makes Difference. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. Marzano, R., Frontier, T. & Livingston (2011). Effective Supervision Supporting the Art and Science of Teaching . Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. Murillo, F.J. (2007). Evaluación del desempeño y carrera profesional docente. Una p anorámica de América y Europa. Santiago de Chile: UNESCO No Child Left Behind. (2002). Public Law 107-110. Pajak, E. (2003). Approaches to Clinical Supervision: Alternatives for Improving Instruction (2nd ed.). Norwood, MA: Christopher Gordon. Sánchez (1994) La supervisión clínica en la práctica: la experiencia de dos estudios de caso en Qurriculum. Universidad de Sevilla Sergiovanni, (1982). Toward a Theory of Supervisory Practice: Integrating the scientific, Clinical and Artistic View. “In supervision teaching. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. Sweeley, T.M. (2004). Teachers’ Attitudes Towards Charlotte Danielson’s Four Domains of Teacher Evaluation . (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from UMI Microform. (3120736) Tobega & Miller (2003) Relationship of Instructional Supervision with Agriculture Teachers” Job Satisfaction and Their Intention to Remain in the Teaching Profession. Journal of Agricultureal Education vol.44 ,number 4 pp 57-66 Worthington, E. L. (1987). Changes in supervision as counselors and supervisors gain experience: A review. Professional Psychology, 18, 189-208. horizontes@pucpr.edu Años LVI-LIX Núms. 108-115 Horizontes – primavera / otoño 2013-2016 45